Weird Thursday

January 22, 2010

Quick recap.

Met Q and Mark and we warmed up. I couldn’t find my mallet before heading out, so I was without it. Terrible. Also, I didn’t have my tape which does a good job of giving me a good grip. Warming up.. I played Mark and took the first game. The second time around – I did well, until I lost the mallet 4! times in a row. Pretty ridiculous. Since Nick showed up, I started a set with Mark while Nick and Q played.

I played like garbage. I scored on myself so many times. This hasn’t happened in so long.. maybe ever. It was really disgusting. I don’t know if I was afraid of losing my mallet, or what. I don’t know if I was just opening up my game too much and was just in a bad position to catch the puck or if I was just handling the puck very poorly. All I know is that it was disgusting to me.

Mark beats me, but he always feels beatable. This set – we both played very good defense, and we had many stalemates. Mark’s style is different from almost everyone else. For a lefty, he plays like a right-hander hitting lots of forehand shots. He also hits from the bottom half of his side, which allows him to hit more overs, and makes it virtually impossible to charge. Mark usually kills me with overs, but this time I was able to adjust. In fact, because of the way Mark plays – he likes to go to whatever scored the time before. I thought I did a good job of adjusting to his offense, and stopped him quite a bit. However, Mark was really keyed into my offense and was able to read me all too well. I normally hit lots of straights against him, but this time, he was able to charge *every* time I hit a straight… and I mixed in pumps, delays, quick drifts.. the whole works – but he read me like a book. I only scored when I ripped perfect unders.

So.. mix in the worst day of puck control… giving Mark points he didn’t earn… throw in that he was reading my offense far too well… and that’s all it takes. I’m not winning this set.. and that’s what happened. Mark beat me 4-1, and I played some of my worst air hockey in the past, oh, 7 months. It was definitely a low point. Terrible, terrible stuff. I felt like I was reliving Plaxico’s night when he shot himself in the leg.

…and for as terrible as I played. Here was Q… beating up on a drunk Nick and taking a set from him. But, just to make sure *everyone* has a terrible night.. Nick gets his rematch where Q is up 3 games to 2. 6-6 game in the 6th, and Nick is called for goaltending. Easy win for Q, right? Wrong. Q duffs what should be the set winner, and Nick not only comes back to take that game… but game 7 as well for the set.

So.. I’ll recap: Dan scores on himself probably 6 times in a set against Mark… and Mark’s night of practice turns into watching Dan shit his pants. Nick loses to Q (and a lot of Mitic points), because he’s too drunk to care. Q, nearly takes 2 sets on Nick, but screws up a freaking open goal shot.

Undeterred, we play a game of press your luck… which was the first time I did seem to shine. In the first game, nobody but myself seemed to have any positive points at all. I made it all but impossible for someone to score on myself, and I think Q may have been -6 or -5 by the end of the game, with Nick not getting out of the negatives, either. I spent a number of rounds taking 0 for my score. The 2nd game went pretty much the same way, with me being very conservative… but Nick nipping at my heels… until the final round, where he managed to get ahead. Ah well.. we all had *something* to be happy about…..but probably more to not be happy about.

Weird night overall.


1 year

January 20, 2010

It’s been exactly 365 days since I first made my first foray out to play air hockey.

I’m ranked #35 in the world (#40 according to Mitic ratings), and I’ve had an incredible amount of fun.

Looking back, I see that I’ve made a lot of progress, and I exceeded my goal of being in the 50’s. I’ve learned pretty much all the shots, and I know my strengths and weaknesses. I achieved this world rank about 4 months ago… and that’s a shame. I should be challenging people left and right… I should be doggedly playing anyone that’s better than me, and trying to outplay them. I need to start working on this.

Nick and Mike have been getting a lot of practice in challenging each other… I need to jump into this and start challenging others as well.


Yarbrough vs. Mitic

January 18, 2010

Ok… this one’s easy. Just go over to Q’s air hockey blog and watch the videos.

Also, I hope in the near future to feature more videos.


Q vs. Rood… the new grudge match

January 15, 2010

Well last night was a lot of fun. Isn’t it always?

Went over to Billy’s… practiced putting (disc golf) in the lighted basketball court across from him, and headed to the BZ.

I’ll get to the drama later on… for now, I’ll just keep to the pucking. Mike, Nick, Eric, Q, Billy, and I were all there and with Eric and Q so amazingly close in skill, I was happy to just watch those two go at it. The match was great. 7-6 game after 7-6 game… all kinds of pressure. Both were playing with their left wall shots, which is new for both of them. Both were ripping solid, hard shots. Both still struggled with puck control. It was just awesome to watch. I wish I could tell you that one player had an obvious advantage or that they had wildly different games. I think the main difference is Eric’s use of pump fakes and off-goals and being a little more willing to play dynamic and take the occasional potshot. Q was using his L-drift and hitting shots really hard. Again.. I have to say, I really like Eric’s style of play… if he really spends some time playing and gets the puck more under control.. he will be really good. I certainly saw him take some shots that were going to score against anyone.

Q won the first set. 4 games to 2, and I think all the games were really close. Unlike my set with Billy… where I think I was able to score against him better than in the past, it’s still not good enough. It’s like he has esp on offense. I’ll get stubborn against the straight, and he’ll hit an under. I’ll get twitchy anticipating the under, and he’ll hit a cross. So.. I’m still a disaster.

After such a close set, I wanted Q and Eric to play another set. Eric just needs the tiniest of edges to beat Q, and I was hoping he’d end his streak of losing and finally take one. Again, it was a close set. 7-6 being another frequent final score. It had to be brutal. I didn’t see much of the set, but I saw Eric work in a couple left wall shots, and follow that up with a good cross. In the 5th game, with Eric up 3 games to 2… again it came down to 6-6. Eric came out charging! We were pretty shocked by this change in defense.. and even though Eric got the puck from doing so, he thought it was a pretty risky thing to do with the set on the line. He got the puck and finished it with a nice rwu to win the set. Congrats, Eric! Well fought game.

Oooh.. actually one other thing to report. In the course of both sets each player was called for goaltending and given a free shot. Both of these idiots missed. I have to give them grief for this.

We played a game of tennis. Eric/Dan vs. Q/Billy… it was a great battle, and I thought Eric and I did incredibly well against Billy. There was a period where Eric *owned* him. It went down to the tiebreaker… and we weren’t able to pull it off. Rough. Another good night of air hockey.

Ok.. so here’s the drama. Nah, screw it.. I’ll post about it later. I’m looking forward to Mike and Goran’s challenge set on Saturday… I’m really hoping Mike pulls this out. It would be sweet.


variations on this offense (from Billy)

January 13, 2010

Billy shot me an email today detailing an offense he said he uses on occasion. I thought I’d post it since we’re talking about different offenses. And since I’m basically a hack who barely has any idea what he’s doing most of the time other than what I’ve been told, I’ll let Billy address this.

so…

Here is an attack that I use that’s similar to the one you sketched. The puck is moved to the left side of the table, to allow the left-wall-under to be struck a bit easier, but still using the left-to-right motion. The follow-throughs on the cut and left-wall-under should be exaggerated towards the right-wall.

The left-wall-under is the key deceptive shot in this attack, followed by the cut. The right-wall-under should be hit with full force to keep the defense honest, but you’re really not looking to score with it. The cross becomes open after the other shots are established, and works best with a set up like the cut, followed by a long time delay, then a direct hit towards the goal.

offensive thoughts


Thoughts (dreams) of a new offense

January 12, 2010

I think this is legit.

I’ve been working this into my game a little lately. Basically, when I find that I’m having a bad time using a standard cross/lwu attack. My crosses seem to be fine, but my lwu’s seem to have a hard time finding the goal. I’ve felt that I need to attack through the left wall… so I’ve been doing this. Seems like the first time I attempt this, and if I’m accurate… it always works.

I’ll shift my stance to the right (I’m right handed).. and this is normally how I need to hit my standard lwu. Then I hit a soft Open V off the left side… then, using a cutting motion – either hit a lwu to the left side of the goal, or smash it straight to the right side of the goal. To hit the left wall under, it’s basically a cut shot – but instead of it going straight.. it goes into the left wall for an under. This is possible because of the body lean to the right.. the position of your body should be that ‘forward’ is towards the upper left corner of the table. The deceptive shot will be the lwu shot.. the non-deceptive shot will be the cut to the right side of the goal. I believe the straight ahead shot won’t work until the lwu shot is established.

See it:
Cut Offense

Now.. the way I have the picture, is making contact when the puck is slightly to the right. I think if the offense does not recenter – you can make a read and shoot straight… and if the offense does recenter, you can hit the lwu – and it should be difficult for the opponent to 1) read, and 2) react to. Also, if you hit it more centered, I think you can more easily work in a left wall over. I’ve used this stance in the past for a cut/rwu attack as well – so the position shift shouldn’t be a complete tipoff (plus, you can use the stance for the normal cross/lwu combo). The one thing that that stance takes away is the ability to hit a good forehand…

So.. someone tell me if this is a legit offense… if someone has used it before – and what kind of success they had. If this is, in fact, legit… I think it may be the next thing to teach Q… because it’s essentially the cut/rwu offense at a 45 degree angle… the only real adjustment would be the position shift.

Edit: Here are Billy’s diagrams (I don’t think you can post pics in the responses)

Diagram A:
Diagram A
Diagram B:
Diagram B


Handicap Tourney in IL? Say it isn’t so.

January 11, 2010

 I know, I know.  Handicap tourney in IL after we’ve been preaching Mitic sets all year.  Seems like I haven’t played too many Mitic sets lately.  Not really a big deal, as I feel I am near where I should be, ratings wise.  Perhaps another challenge here or there would be fun… and just climb the ladder.  This would especially be the case if Mike beats Goran next week (Saturday, 1pm!).  If Mike beats Goran, he’ll have a wave of challengers.. with me on the top of that list.

Anyway.. back to the tourney.  I recall deciding to have handicap tourneys around the time we had the IL tourney.  We thought it would be good to split time between handicap tourneys and ‘practice’.. and by practice, I mean, playing mitic sets against whoever is around.  So.. I start out playing against a guy named Justin.  When I checked the sheet, I saw that he was a 0.  Great, I figure I can beat some kid who can barely see over the table… and spot him 3 points.  Turns out Justin was an older teenager and has been playing more years than I.  Great.  I spot him 3 points, and try my best not to make any mistakes.  He played a back rail defense… which meant that I was shooting straights at him constantly.  His offense is random, but he hits it pretty hard… oh, and in every single game, I managed to score on myself at least once.  Suffice to say, I was playing like a turd.  So, I thought I had him under wraps after taking the first two games.. (both 7-6 wins)… but then he came back and took the next two (both 7-6).  I came back and took the final game by a decent margin after I had figured out his offense.. and quit being so damn twitchy.    Still.. my first taste of a handicap tourney left me thinking that I really need to tighten up and play good… especially if I’m spotting someone points.
 
I played Geoff next, and I got a point this time.  I figured it would be close if I didn’t get a point, but should win without too much problem in the end with a point.  This turned into quite the barn burner, though.  I have to mix up my offense a little too much against Geoff, and my accuracy is sometimes lacking.  My forehand left wall under – which has been really great lately – completely fizzled.  I just had no accuracy with it.  When I was ripping this shot in the previous month… it was a great go-to shot… but everytime I tried it, it missed badly. We went back and forth with wins, and I completely destroyed Geoff in the 4th game (I believe 7-0). The deciding game came down to the final point. I had actually gotten my forehand lwu to sink, finally for the 6th point – and Geoff came back and matched it. I called time out with it 6-6 in the final game. I had worked a slow open v drift off the left wall and hit a lwu using a cut motion. I decided I’d try that again, but hit a cut to the right side. It was a perfect shot, as I used the lwu under duress situations before… and I took the set… squeaking by Geoff. Winning with a point spot (especially when you really need it) doesn’t feel like it was earned… but I’ll take it.

I then had a long wait before I played John. He was one of the first guys I ever played nearly a year ago, and I had to give him a point. The last time I played him, I beat him pretty badly. It was going to be a lot closer this time around with the points. John has a great offense… just a shade worse than the regulars… but he plays a back rail defense… which means I’m coming at him with a lot of straights. It really felt like I got the best of him with my cross (which is more accurate than my cut)… and I just hit it over and over again until he started charging. Then, I’d mix in a cut or do a different drift. I think he managed to take two games off of me, just because my straights were so damn inaccurate… but in the final game – I stuck it to him. I guess Goran was betting with Billy that John would win. Maybe he found out I have money on Mike to beat him (I have pretty good odds)… either way – Goran lost as I hit accurate straights. I think I hit 2 bank shots the entire game. 2 too many.

Then I watched Pat play Q. We had Q playing a little high as a 2, and Pat was a little low as a 2. Pat was playing really good… probably the best I’ve ever seen him play. He was never more accurate, and his puck control was the best I’ve ever seen him play. Pat wiped the floor with Q for the first two games, before Q got his concentration back and Pat came down to the ground with some more inaccurate shots. Q tied it up before the final game… and Pat was too much to handle. It was great to see the match go back and forth. Q should be really proud of himself for keeping it as close as he did vs. an experienced player (Pat did incredibly well in Houston, taking the doubles tourney with Danny… in several matches – Pat took control for the team. It was a sight to behold).

I then had to play Pat… and spot him a point. He was absolutely killing Q with his rwu – which has always been his strength… and I was determined to shut this shot down. I have to say.. I was very successful in doing so… but his straight was too accurate – and scored on me too much. He mixed in a couple really nice lwu’s.. and I was toast. This was right after he beat Billy.. which took all of 5 minutes to play (getting spotted 4 points will do that). Pat was on fire – playing well above his ‘2′ rating.

I was sent to the loser’s bracket. Had I beat Pat – I’d be in the finals… but it wasn’t to be. I was guaranteed at least 3rd place, though. All I had to do was beat Billy with a 3 point lead. Not much to say other than Billy is really hard to score against. Billy favors his defense to his right.. so I kept trying to take advantage of this. Only perfect and really hard lwu’s will go, and he has some ability to read straights. He favors his right.. so cuts and lwu’s are that much harder to hit. I kept trying to get his defense to recenter to his left, but when he did – it only made it harder to hit a shot to his right. I need to find an offense that will force him to recenter, while allowing me to hit the right side of his goal. I have an idea.. but I’m not quite there yet. I did manage to force a final game… but it was Billy’s day.

…Billy went on to beat Pat twice in a row to take the tourney. I finished 3rd. All in all.. it was a great day. Lots of really close matches… there were ‘upsets’.. not that they’re really upsets… but unexpected people won out. Me over Geoff… John over Goran…. Pat over everyone. It’s a ‘fun’ format that we expect to repeat.

In the meantime… Mike will be challenging Goran next Saturday.. and I will be there to watch. The record against each other in sets has been split 3-3 in their last 6 meetings. Goran is highly favored to win, but Mike has been outstanding lately… and will take the momentum he got from beating Goran in the IL tourney. If Mike can get that ‘tournament’ mindset… he’s really tough to beat.


Interview: Q

January 3, 2010

Ok, so this is really long.. and not edited entirely correctly, but I want to get this up.

My wife complains bitterly about the style of this blog – how it’s just pages and pages of text with few, if any pictures or anything to break it up. Considering that most people who read this are add riddled, I can only hope they go into hyperfocus when they get to my site. So, the Q interview. I have to give props to Q for returning this so quickly, unlike Mike, who’s had… oh 6 months now.. and it’s to the point where I refuse to publish his interview even if he were to get around to getting it back to me. Last night, he thought I should replace some of his questions with questions about air hockey… which makes me believe that Mike just doesn’t get it.

So, with this backdrop – I give you Q, who, at this point, is infinitely more awesome than Mike right now – who’s probably out slashing tires on this New Year’s Eve.

So.. I can’t say too much about Q other than he’s the new player and is dedicated to the point where he has his own stinkin’ blog. My interviews are a way to ‘break up the monotony’ as it were… and I’d like to point out that he has no such gimmick on his blog to my knowledge. Oh, and sometimes he gets his facts wrong. You probably still want to come here first for all your Chicagoland air hockey dishing.

Why am I talking such shit? Q’s great.. and I love how he’s answered this interview… I feel like I’ve given him opportunities to let his personality shine through. So, here you go.

1. Let’s say you’re on Survivor. You manage to make it to the final 3. Your strategy to get to the finals was a two part plan. First off, you were fiercely loyal to 2 strong players and you helped vote everyone else off the island. You were basically a follower of these two, and went with any strategy they had in mind. Your other strategy to get to the final 3 was to piss off everyone you voted off, making you appear as a very weak player by the other two, who knew you’d have the worst shot of getting voted on to get the million dollars at the end. By all accounts, not a single person will vote for you… and everyone else thinks the other two are more ‘deserving’ of the money. You have one shot to win over the crowd and give a speech to get them to vote for you. What do you say?

Well, if Family Guy has taught me anything, all I would say would be “Nine Eleven” I’d try to give something classy and inspirational, but that’s not my style. I’d probably go with: “We all have been through an amazing experience here. Alliances have been formed, some broken, backs stabbed, but at this point, you have to look at the game. The three staples of the game are ‘Outwit, Outplay, and Outlast’. For whatever reason, the three of us stand before you as the final three. I could stand here and apologize for my actions against all of you, but it may not be enough. I did what I had to do in order to ensure that I could be standing here right now. This is after all a game and your vote should be for the best player of the game. So I ask you, who played the game the best? These two unsuspecting fools or the predator that was smart enough to fool these two into feeling as though I would not be a threat to them at this moment. I took a risk by acting out you who will now decide upon the outcome of this game. Just know that it was all part of the game, and that I am sorry for any pain I have caused.” or “Vote for me, we’ll split the prize money”

2. Ok smartypants… tell me about material science… what you like about it, what you dislike about it… and what you hope to do once you get your PhD.

This question comes up a lot and it’s kind of funny that a lot of us Material Scientist don’t have the best explanation of what the subject itself it. I’ve worked on my answer for awhile now and just know that if you ask 5 different MSE majors, you may get 5 slightly different answers. So…here goes: I define material science, or a lot of subjects, by what problem/question the science is trying to solve. The “paradigm” of materials science is finding the correlation between a material’s structure, processing, properties, & performance. This is why when you ask a material scientist what they do or what they study you’ll get a plethora of answers. They could a metallurgist, a polymer scientist, a ceramist (which is technically what my undergrad degree is in because the Ceramic Department at Rutgers was in transition to getting accredited as a MSE program). As for what I like about it, I’d say the biggest thing I like about it is the performance end of things/understanding how and why things work. There are a lot of examples where you see real materials in real world applications and it’s just incredible how much science is there. For example, I watched a show on National Geographic channel yesterday that showed Underwriters Laboratories testing bullet resistant plastic with high speed cameras filming. (similar to Time Warp on Discovery, but seemed more sciency than that). The layered polymer sheets acted in a very specific way. The first layer took energy away from the bullet by melting/heat dissipation. The second sheet broke apart the bullet and spread it out through it’s layer. The third layer was undamaged. I missed the intro to know exactly what the materials were, but it’s an example of where the materials properties/structure (e.g. what polymers) & processing (e.g. how the sheets were laminated together) affected the performance (e.g. bullet resistance). As for what I don’t like, that’s tough. My current research is more physical chemistry than material science which is probably why a lot of times I sound less than enthusiastic about it. (well that and just general research frustrations about the direction and/or equipment). The subject of material science itself is fascinating to me, hard to pick out something I don’t like about it. Once I’m done with grad school, to be honest I am going to just look for an R&D job at a company. (job examples of friends who have graduated: R&D Scientist @ Intel in Portland, startup companies in Illinois, Honeywell/UoP, British Petroleum, etc…, Research assistant @ Argonne National Lab, post doctoral positions @ universities, faculty @ university). I had thought way back when that I wanted to go on the faculty track, but I’ve become more and more keen to just getting a job at a good company. (i.e. I need $) As for location….I’ve been out in Illinois for 7 years now, but I’m still a part NJ boy at heart. My wife does love her job out here though and NJ doesn’t have a huge air hockey scene yet so I don’t know for sure where we’ll end up. Being a vet tech, her job is more easily relocatable so it may boil down to wherever my job takes us, but to get me to move somewhere random (and without air hockey) it would have to be one pretty nice offer.

3. Air hockey! Yes.. it’s really awesome that you’re hooked on air hockey. The fact that you called it an ‘addiction’ is eerily similar to my story of air hockey as well. I think it’s awesome that you’re so damn competitive and you’re quickly learning. I don’t want to think of myself as done learning or that I’m not getting better… but I feel like I’ve learned about as much as I can… and now it’s just about executing and refining my game. I don’t think I can just jump in skill by a whole lot (I dunno, maybe… it’s possible)… and I think there will be *some time* in the future when you will win a set against me. When do you think that will be, and what do you think you’ll need to accomplish before you’re able to do so?

Hmm…when do I think I’ll beat you in a set? Minimum: at least 9mo. to a year from now. And one of the limiting factors: the time that we all practice. I think it was in Billy’s interview where he said he used to play 6hrs/day 6 days/week and just that we play 1-2 times a week means that you’ll still be getting better (near the top of the learning curve if you feel you’ve learned as much as you can) and I’m near the bottom of the learning curve still so I’ll be picking up things quickly that you’ve been using for a year now or so I think. There’s a lot to accomplish before that’s possible barring a fluke upset in a full set. While the RWU/cut attack may not be too limiting, I feel like I’m going to need something else to come at you with. This will take some time. (need to perfect the RWU/cut first, then learn and perfect a new combo) The other things like drifts and deception will come along by the time I have that done I think. With just my drifting improved and the RWU/cut perfected, maybe I’d force it to a game 5 or 6, but probably wouldn’t take 4. My biggest hurdle by far is going to be developing my in game mentality during a set. I get flustered easily and lose my cool in sets if I get down early. The same thing used to happen when I played floor hockey goalie but I eventually got to a point where I can take out my frustration early and achieve a Zen like state to get my head back into the game. (1 shot/save at a time, ignoring previous highs and lows, analyzing the current situations more). It’s probably the fast paced game that gets me the most out of my zone. Hopefully I can get this sorted out sooner rather than later.

4. I’ve been working math questions into my interviews because I can’t resist. I have a feeling this will take you about 2 minutes to solve. Here goes: You have eight balls all of the same size… 7 of them weigh the same, and one of them weighs slightly more. How can you find the ball that is heavier by using a balance and only two weighings?

Slightly under 2 minutes. (It’s like racing the guy in the Red Eye on sudokus) I love questions like this. Gets the gears turning. First: weigh 3 of the balls vs. 3 of the balls. Second: If the first was a match, you weigh compare the 2 remaining balls vs. one another and the heavier one will tilt the balance. If the first was not a match, take 2 of the 3 balls that were heavier and weigh them vs. one another. If they match, the one weighed ball is the heavier one. If they don’t match, the heavier one will tilt the balance.

5. Guantanamo Bay: Is it ok to house suspected terrorists there without trial indefinitely? Why/Why not?

I was worried there may be political questions, but I’ll give it a shot…..I don’t believe it is. One of the great things about the U.S. is the freedom we have and the right to due process. While some may argue that the ends could justify the means, it goes against the core values that this country was founded on. The federal court system should be able to charge and try suspected terrorists.

At first, I thought the question was about torturing of subjects and I’ll just throw in my two cents about that. I don’t believe any information gained for torture should be considered credible. When in that kind of state, a person would say whatever will make the pain stop, whether it be true, or simply what the enforcer wants to hear.

6. I love food. In fact, I learned to cook at a pretty early age. I’d come home from school, be it grade school or high school, and I’d ask my mom the age old question, “What’s for dinner?” She would frequently reply, “I’m not hungry.” – she did this typically on nights when my dad was working late… she didn’t want to have to cook two dinners. She never kept me from cooking my own food, in fact, she’d encourage me to “make enough for my father”. So, I’d dig through the cookbooks – find a recipe where we had all the ingredients and get to work. Many times, I had no idea what I was doing – and I’d call in my mom to help me figure something out. It was when she took the reigns that I’d duck out of the kitchen and let her finish up. Sometimes, I’d finish my own meal without doing this, but typically when I was older. It was great when I was in college – because I’d cook for myself all the time. I was one of the few guys I knew who’d have a girl over for dinner. The days when women did all the cooking are gone, completely gone. I know just as many ladies as guys who don’t know how to cook. You mentioned that you like to bake… and I’m pretty terrible at baking bread and the like. Tell me how you got into it, gimme a recipe to try, and some tips to help me avoid disaster.

I too love food. Honestly moving in with my wife (at the time, my girlfriend) was my motivation to start cooking more so that way we’d not have the same thing every night and let’s face it, I think being a guy that can cook scores some extra points. As for baking, it was the wedding that really got me into it. I’d always enjoy making cakes for people’s birthdays but typically it’d be the Betty Crocker box and jar that made the appearance. Now, don’t get me wrong…sometimes the boxed cake mix is just as good, if not better than some from scratch recipes. The chemicals that the companies have is a lot more extensive than the home cook and you can get extremely good results reproducibly. But there’s just something about a cake from scratch. I’m still exploring the world of baking and my expertise lies probably solely in the world of leavened cakes currently. I’m moving on the cheesecakes (which are technically more of a custard) and breads are next. But back to how I got started. My wife and I were looking into wedding cakes and the price of cakes for a wedding was to me absolutely ridiculous. (more on why it’s not so bad later). Being as stubborn as I am, I said “I’m not going to pay this much for a cake. I can easily do it myself.” I started reading up on baking cakes from scratch, trying different recipes I came across, and from reading, baking as opposed to cooking is more precise. There was a great clip of some chef on the today show. The guy was making some vegetable pasta dish. He just throws in garlic, peppers, onions, etc. and the host asks “Oh how much garlic was that?” to which the chef responded “ I don’t know. Listen cooking is more of a subjective thing. You like garlic? You add a little bit more. You like spice, add some more pepper.”

Baking is the opposite. Baking is a complex dance of chemicals, preparation, and ingredients. The key, to which I still have to get the necessary equipment, is to weigh your ingredients. A lot of recipes simply call for cups, teaspoons, etc. but I can put a cup of all purpose flour on a balance with another cup of flour and the differences you see in the weight will be huge. There are plenty of resources on the web which give average volume to weight ratios. As for the wedding cupcakes. And I’m not kidding about the name, but I made Meyer Limoncello Cupcakes with a Meyer lemon Mousseline Buttercream. (a Meyer lemon is a cross between a mandarin orange and a lemon) This brings me to my thought about why bakeries charge so much for cakes. Not only for the quality of the product, but for the decision and care that must go into ensuring the cake can handle the environment, the delivery, the setup. If I ran a bakery, I’d charge more than some of the other ones based on the experiences I had making my own. In extremely humid conditions, you have to stay away from certain types of frostings because of the hydroscopic nature of the sugar. When using fondant, the covered cake should not be refrigerated because condensation can make the final product look splotchy. Royal icing is dangerous to use on soft buttercream because of the moisture content of the buttercream. My other big suggestion is that you not get discouraged.

Found a saying once that “a sad cupcake is a happy cupcake.” Sad cupcakes/cakes often refer to when the cupcake sinks in the middle. If you put a high tower of frosting on that, who would know? Another example is that the frosting I used for the wedding took me several months to perfect. (only trying on average 1-2 times/mo.) It wouldn’t take you that long if I gave you all of my notes on it because some of the steps were trial and error to find the perfect way to do it. Over beating is another big cake problem. A lot of people over beat cake batters made from scratch which causes lots of issues. A handy resource: http://www.baking911.com/cakes/problems.htm As for a recipe to try, the best bets are in a cookbook called BakeWise. The author is a former chemical engineer and she goes into the science behind why each ingredient is in the cake. There’s reasons why some cakes work in a bundt pan & not in others for example which she goes into. Honestly I think that book & Rose’s books are the only desk reference a baker needs to get anything and everything done with baking.

The best frosting I have ever had is the Mousseline buttercream from the Cake Bible by Rose Levy B.. I don’t own the books though so I have to see if I can find the recipes online. Sort of off the wall cupcakes that I’ve found fun to make are Chockylit’s: http://cupcakeblog.com/

Oooh, I’ll have to go dig through my history on my home computer but Tres Leches Cupcakes with raspberry whipped cream frosting were probably some of the biggest hits I’ve made. Once I find it, I’ll post it in the comments on this post.

7.Here’s the space where you say nice things about me. What are the good qualities you see in me that we share? What are some good qualities in me that we don’t share? Don’t feel the need to just answer these questions – go ahead and expound about how great I am.

My mom always said, if you can’t say anything nice about someone, don’t say anything at all…I kid, I kid. And I’ll focus just on you here, but most of it applies to the rest of the IL players that I’ve met too. (don’t want them to feel left out)

Common: Generous: Honestly when we first met at the IL state, I walked away thinking wow, that you are awesome guy. (I knew some things about you after reading through some of your blog by that point) You seem genuinely eager and willing to help a new guy such as myself learn the ropes, which I too hope to someday be able to do. A lot of times you see experts in fields/sports not willing to do that since it may give them a new challenger, but not you. Being the new guy at that time, I figured most of you would have your own little clique and it’d be tough trying to get in, but quite the opposite which I think speaks to your character in a good way.

Humorous: We both have a sense of humor. My humor tends to be sarcastic, pop culture referenced or random and I thought that if you didn’t have a sense of humor at all, I’d be extremely uncomfortable in any setting outside being across from the table during a game/set, which I’m not. My jokes may not be funny, but at least I can use them.

Committed: From the length of this blog and just from conversations, you’re committed/passionate about air hockey which shows something…not sure what word to put with it as a trait, but it’s a good quality to see that someone feels so strongly about something.

Competitive: You have to be in this sport and a little rivalry/competition never hurt anyone. Uncommon: Not sure about this one. Not that we’re completely the same but my only “bad” (in quotes because I don’t think they’re bad, but others might) qualities are my stubbornness and my slight pessimism at times so if you’re not stubborn or are an optimist, I guess those would be uncommon traits.

8.So, I had a nickname once upon a time. In high school I had a friend who would consistently order a big meal if we were at a restaurant.. eat a couple bites – maybe a quarter of it, and then say he was too full to eat any more. I’d give him a look, and he’d shove his plate over to me. I’m the least picky eater in the world – there’s only one food I don’t like the taste of, and it’s uni (raw sea urchin). So, instead of ordering a full meal myself – I’d get a soda or something and wait for my friend to not eat his… it was great – cheap for me, and we didn’t waste any food. I had earned the nickname, “catfish” for my bottom feeding. The worst example of this was when a bunch of my friends were out drinking… We were pretty wasted and ended up at an all-night diner and my very, very drunk friend ordered biscuits & gravy (he called ‘em “scribbits” for some reason)… I probably had something, too – and my friend ate maybe half of his order… and instead of giving in to my charms – he wraps them up like he’s going to eat them later. I remember being pretty hammered and thinking that my friend was just spiting me and I became strangely fixated on his biscuits & gravy. We’re on the way to his place, and he’s looking pretty green. I say, “man – you’re not looking so good, you’re not going to finish this are you?” He says, “I think I’m going to be sick.” I say, “so, you don’t mind if I have your scribbits?” …and he just shook his head… holding back his vomit. We get back to his place and we roll out of the car. I start eating his scribbits with my fingers – and my friend doesn’t get two steps before he starts throwing up. I’m drunkenly shovelling biscuits and gravy into my mouth while also trying to take care of my friend. I’m mumbling with a full mouth, “Ok buddy, get it all out, that’s good…. Ooh, look out, you’re getting some on me.” – and he threw up on my shoes… Now – we didn’t drive ourselves, and my other – more sober friends are literally rolling around on the ground laughing and crying at this sight. I certainly earned my nickname that night. So… uh.. 2 things – tell me about your nicknames and tell me an embarrassing story about yourself.

That is an awesome story. The only nicknames that I have to my knowledge are something stemming from my last name, Quezada. Q came about because one of my best friends in HS was named Bryan and my other’s brother in law, Brian. So I became Q, named after the Star Trek:TNG character and/or 007’s gadget guy. Q-bert, came around for a little bit and a few people still use it. Some have said Quesadilla but that was short lived. My screenames on instant messaging/user names are usually Sleeper1223 or some variation. Self given/chosen really based on a Dream Theater song character, but also along the lines of being lurking ready to attack or not one to be messed with. Unfortunately, no really funny stories associated with the nicknames themselves.

As for an embarrassing story, I’ll go with one of the drunken adventure one. My first winter in IL, me and a bunch of other first year grad students went out to Sheffield’s. This is way before their remodelling where the seats up on the window where you first entered were just a long bench (with the back against the window) and a ledge in front with candles and wide enough to put drinks down. It’s getting towards the end of the night and we’re a bunch of pitchers of beer in. I just remember leaning on something talking to my friend, pretty wasted. All of the sudden, near my right shoulder, I could swear was getting warmer (I was looking/talking to my left). To my friend, I jokingly slurred “My arm feels warm, am I on fire?” to which I looked down and sure enough, I was on fire. A spot about the size of a softball caught on one of the candles and I blew on it which I think got it going a little bit so I patted it out. Now, after setting oneself on fire, you would think, the bouncer near the door about 6 ft away would kick me out, but they didn’t notice. You would think we’d all leave, but nope, we stuck around and finished our beers. We probably would have stayed longer but I knocked over a beer by accident at one point so we decided it was time to go. But not go home. We went to Chicago Pizza and there’s a photo of me there with this huge smile because I have pizza, and with a hole in my shirt. The nightmares of being on fire only lasted a few months after that where I would wake up flailing thinking the covers were fire. Candles still freak me out if I’m drinking sometimes.

Q is totally wasted

9. Tell me what kind of music you like… my music tastes are all over the place… from obscure electronic and alt-country to soundscapes and alt-rock/pop. I recall seeing some kind of band t-shirt on you. Disturbed or something? Tell me about the music you’re into and how frequently you listen to ‘new’ stuff… and how you hear ‘new’ stuff.

Good memory. It was a Disturbed T-shirt. My tastes are a bit all over, but the foundation lies in the rock and roll & alternative sections. Examples of some of my favorite bands showing some of the spread are: Metallica, Dream Theater, Shinedown, The Beatles, Billy Joel, Megadeth (earlier stuff…starting to lose track of what they’re up to), AC-DC, Everclear, Disturbed, Hootie & the Blowfish, Green Day, Three Days Grace. I could go on and on. Those are just some of the ones I can think of where I have a majority of their collection in my library. It’s hard to explain how I find the songs I like but a lot of times, especially lately because I’m in the car more, I flip amongst the radio and hear newer stuff that way. I go to concerts of the bands I like when I can and from those I see other bands that way. I’m always up for hearing new stuff regardless of the genre and I may or may not like it. I have anywhere from Britney to Garth Brooks to Yanni to Slipknot in my collection.

10. Ok.. so the last couple times we’ve played air hockey at the place on Western, the table is a little bit off. A couple screws could be fixed.. and it really bugged you that you didn’t have anything on you to fix it. I thought it was.. I guess.. interesting that you were so compelled to fix something right then and there. It was like you were a walking MacGyver or something. Where did this compulsion come from and what are some of the things you’ve been compelled to fix over the years?

I think the compulsion lies somewhere in my like of knowing how things work to my stubbornness. Like with the wedding cupcakes, I refused to believe that cakes should cost that much, so I must be able to do it myself. Same goes for fixing things. I know when I’m in over my head and need a professional’s help. (except that one time with the kitchen sink), but there are a lot of simple little things that I think I should be able to fix myself. Maybe it’s me being competitive with me, but I should be no match for a couple loose screws on an air hockey table. (it’s like the table is challenging me to fix it) Also, slightly annoys me that it’s such a simple fix and Waveland hasn’t down it. It’s been going on for a long time now so eventually the database in my head of all little tiny fixes and useless information grows to the point where I can logically figure out little problems that are around. When I can’t fix it, it’s like a direct challenge that I must then beat. Things that I’m compelled to fix: Anything that’s broken….Just off the top of my head, computers are a big thing. I will fix broken computers or figure out what’s wrong with them. (software or hardware) I’ve tried, and failed fixing a waffle iron that wouldn’t stay on. (almost found the work around the temperature interlock that was broken but shorted it out by accident). I’ve fixed a co-worker’s gold bracelet with the spot welder in the lab once. I recently fixed the group’s network printer by throwing the circuit board into a 150 degree oven for 10 minutes. (weirdest fix in awhile). Random household things: shelves, wobbly chairs, leaky faucets, etc. More often than not, I call myself MacGruber rather than McGuyver as a joke. Except for the waffle iron, none of my fixes blow up though.

So there you have it. I like that he used the word ‘hydroscopic’ and that I knew what it meant. I think we covered it all, from torture to cupcakes. Fo’ realz.


Have I mentioned it’s cold outside?

January 3, 2010

really cold.

Drove out to the BZ… lost a tire in the process. Had a massive blowout and had to throw a tiny spare out in the middle of Southbound I-355 traffic. Thank god it was by the toll, so people were only driving 85 miles an hour past me instead of the normal 120.

I warmed up with Nick and Q. Nick had knocked the dust off his game last Wednesday, so was playing a bit better. We played a little king of the table and Nick stays on for quite awhile before either of us is able to beat him. Billy eventually shows, and we play a little game to 75 (our 3 points for a straight, 2 for over, 1 for everything else). I thought Nick and I did rather well against Billy.. but he was going to go on his runs. I was able to use a left wall open-V drift against Billy.. hitting a left wall under shot using a cut motion… that seemed to catch Billy by surprise. So much that when I hit a cut from the right side, he froze and I was able to hit a straight shot. Nonetheless.. I hit a poor defense streak and Nick outscored me as Billy rallied to 75.

Q and Nick played a set, and I was pretty excited to see how it was going to end up. At this point in Q’s development, Nick should be able to wipe the floor with him… but it was close. Damn close. First game, 7-6 Nick. 2nd game, 7-6 Nick, 3rd game, 7-6 Nick. Nick was 3-0, but with the tiniest of margins. 21 pts. to 18… it’s as close as you can get. Nick finished Q off with a 7-5 win. Nick should be worried the next time this matchup comes. I don’t know if it’s because Nick is out of practice or if Q is really in practice… but if we were playing a handicap set – Q would’ve had it the whole way. I’d be interested to see how Q fares against Nick in the next 2 months. It’s quite possible Q could come out ahead.

Nick asked me for a set, and mentioned that it’s quite likely he had the most Mitic sets under his belt in all of 2009, and I’d say he was right. He’d gained a lot of experience in the past year.. and had big fluctuations in his ratings. I’ve really had Nick’s number lately, and I believe I have a pretty good strategy against him. I feel as though if I stretch my time of possession out against Nick, it’s as though there’s a timer counting down in his head that makes him really want to score fast.. that if he hasn’t had control of the puck in awhile… as soon as he gets the puck he wants to score quickly. This leads to him taking lots of potshots and not being patient in setting up his shots. I used a simple tactic against him… a simple diagonal drift – then, using a cut motion – either hitting an off-goal left or right (75% of the time), and then the other 25% of the time – I’d attempt a cut or rwu. With the number of off-goals I’d hit, I’d sometimes have the puck for very, very long possessions. Nick was able to grab a couple off-goals… but he’d go into his ‘quick-score’ offense.. which consisted of him trying to score as soon as possible. I’ve gotten to the point where my defense is pretty good against a speed attack… that to be successful against me, being deceptive is very important. Now, I think my offense is good, but it’s not outstanding. I had my moments, but I feel as though I created an edge with just mere patience and puck control. If I’m not mistaken, I won 4 games in a row with Nick not scoring more than 4 points a game. This is likely the biggest win against Nick I’ve ever posted. After the set, Nick commented that my defense was incredible… and I agreed… but after thinking about it – I think it had more to do with Nick not setting up his shots than it did with my defense. I’ve no problem with discussing my strategy against Nick. I want him to adjust and become a better player. It’s really no secret that Billy has told him to take fewer potshots… but in the heat of battle, Nick goes back to his old form. I really don’t think Nick is a better player than me… there’s no way he’s physically better than me. The only advantage I have on Nick is my approach to the game, my strategy, and discipline.

Billy, Q, and I went and played some disc golf in the snow until the sun went down. I then made a long trip home on my tiny spare… looking for an auto shop, but ended up driving very slow on the way home. Took me forever.


just a quick note

December 31, 2009

Went out to the BZ last night… was told Mike, Geoff, and Goran would be there to play. Called Nick and twisted his arm to come out, and he did… and even Mark was able to come out. Surely all the talk of challenges this and challenge that has sparked the need for some practice.

We just played a bunch of practice games, and everyone got more than their fill of air hockey. I started out on fire… winning two practice games against Goran (though I doubt he was playing as hard as me, it still felt great to win). Really.. just being able to score consistently against Goran was pretty sweet. I’ve always found his defense to be underrated. I even won my next game against Geoff and took a couple off of Nick. I figured I was the most practiced player going into tonight, and it showed. I’m pretty sure Goran thought I was a bit of a clown being so proud of winning a couple games off of him, when he didn’t seem to care.

Mark brought me to Earth, though. One of my weaknesses is overs, and he was able to hit them incredibly accurately against me from both sides. He’s got such a frenetic attack, that it’s hard not to be a little jumpy against him. I don’t think I beat him all night, and he even dealt a 7-1 beating on me. I felt like I should have been able to score almost at will on him looking at his defense… but my accuracy struggles at times.

Goran got his revenge on me later as he practiced his rwu on me. Earlier, I had a better time blocking it – but then lost that ability later on.

Anyway.. I got to see Mike and Goran play… Mike won, and I wasn’t sure if Goran was giving his all… I tried to analyze Goran’s loss as if Goran was setting Mike up for some kind of false confidence…a rope-a-dope strategy, if you will. I don’t think that really applies to air hockey, though.